• Pitch Deck Consistency Evaluation Checklist

  • 1. Punctuation Consistency Score (0-10):

  • [ ] Check for consistent use of punctuation:

  • - Are commas, periods, and colons used uniformly across all slides?

  • - Is the Oxford comma consistently applied?

  • **Scoring:**

  • - [ ] 10: Perfect punctuation across all sections.

  • - [ ] 8-9: A few minor inconsistencies (1-2).

  • - [ ] 6-7: Noticeable issues (3-4).

  • - [ ] 4-5: Multiple inconsistencies (5-7).

  • - [ ] 0-3: Significant issues (8+).

  • **Score: ____/10**

  • ---

  • **2. Design Consistency Score (0-10):**

  • [ ] Evaluate the consistency of design elements:

  • - Are fonts, colors, and layouts uniform across all slides?

  • - Are key slides (e.g., financial overview) aligned with the overall design?

  • **Scoring:**

  • - [ ] 10: Perfectly uniform design.

  • - [ ] 8-9: A few small design variations (1-2).

  • - [ ] 6-7: Some noticeable design differences (3-4).

  • - [ ] 4-5: Several design inconsistencies.

  • - [ ] 0-3: Major design issues.

  • **Score: ____/10**

  • ---

  • **3. Slide Transition Flow Score (0-10):**

  • [ ] Assess the smoothness of transitions between slides:

  • - Does the presentation move logically from one slide to the next?

  • - Is the narrative clear and easy to follow?

  • **Scoring:**

  • - [ ] 10: Seamless transitions.

  • - [ ] 8-9: A couple of minor hiccups (1-2).

  • - [ ] 6-7: Some noticeable breaks (3-4).

  • - [ ] 4-5: Several disruptions in flow.

  • - [ ] 0-3: Major issues that break the narrative.

  • **Score: ____/10**

    4. Visual Consistency Score (0-10):

    Check the consistency of visual elements:

  • Are icons, charts, and images uniform in style and placement?

  • Is data visualization consistent across slides?

    Scoring:

    [ ] 10: Visuals are consistent and reinforce the message.

    [ ] 8-9: A few minor inconsistencies (1-2).

    ] 6-7: Some noticeable differences (3-4).

    [ ] 4-5: Several inconsistencies in visuals.

    [ ] 0-3: Major visual inconsistencies.

    Score: ____/10

5. Content Structure Score (0-10):

  • [ ] Evaluate the structure of the content:

  • - Are headings, bullet points, and formatting consistent?

  • - Is the content easy to read and follow?

  • **Scoring:**

  • - [ ] 10: Content is well-structured and easy to read.

  • - [ ] 8-9: A few minor structural differences (1-2).

  • - [ ] 6-7: Some noticeable inconsistencies (3-4).

  • - [ ] 4-5: Several structural issues that disrupt the message.

  • - [ ] 0-3: Major issues that make the deck hard to understand.

  • **Score: ____/10**

  • ---

  • **Overall Consistency Score (0-10):**

  • [ ] Calculate the average of the scores from the above categories.

  • **Scoring:**

  • - 9-10: Excellent consistency—adds value and professionalism.

  • - 7-8: Strong consistency with a few minor issues.

  • - 5-6: Average consistency—acceptable but could be improved.

  • - 3-4: Below-average consistency, which could hurt investor confidence.

  • - 0-2: Poor consistency, signaling major issues in the presentation.

  • **Aggregate Score: ___/50**

  • ---

  • This checklist allows you to systematically evaluate a pitch deck's consistency across key areas and calculate an overall score that can be used to assess its quality and professionalism.

Next
Next

TAM, SAM, MS Calculator